Legal Opinion

George Hamilton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1936No. 17843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of fifty ($50.00) dollars, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

Appellant’s only contention is that the testimony adduced by the State, which is wholly circumstantial, is insufficient to sustain his conviction. In order to determine this question we will briefly relate salient criminative facts upon which the State relied for conviction.

The testimony shows that on the night of December 31, 1934, soon after midnight someone…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGarry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Graves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Barr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Lovell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API