Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 16, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus.

Relators being charged with a violation of Chapter 21076, Acts of 1941, procured writ of habeas corpus to test the constitutionality of the Act.

The title of the Act is:

“AN ACT Regulating the Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in Counties having a population of over 265,000 According to the Last State or Federal Census; Defining Certain Terms as Set Forth Herein; Fixing Certain Hours When Alcoholic Beverages may Not Be Sold; Providing Exceptions for Hotels, Package Stores, Restaurants and Night Clubs; Providing for a Penalty for the Violation Hereof;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Hiers v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Whitney v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Anderson v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clein v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Kass v. LewinSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. Cates v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Housing Authority v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Wernle v. Bellemead Development CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API