Martin v. State

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of knowingly having a forged check in his possession with intent to pass it as true, under article 939, P. 0., and was assessed the lowest punishment.

The sole objection to the court’s charge was fully met by the. court in giving appellant’s special charge on that subject covering the point of objection. The court gave a correct charge properly submitting the question upon the offense of which appellant was found guilty, and also therein gave a correct charge on circumstantial evidence. There is no objection at all to the court’s charge other than as…