Legal Opinion

Corbin Supply Co. v. Loftis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 2, 1934No. 24090Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

We are aware of the principle that in proving a contract alleged to have been made with a corporation, it is necessary to prove the contract itself and the authority of the agent who purports to execute it. See Ailey v. Lindale Co-operative Store, 33 Ga. App. 63 (125 S. E. 717).

The contract in the present case was in writing, and it became necessary to show the authority of Luhn, the agent, to execute it, or that the corporation had knowingly accepted benefits thereunder.

The evidence shows that when the plaintiffs approached the defendant with reference to the matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ailey v. Lindale Co-operative StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Greer v. BurnamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API