Inyo County, California v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
538 U.S. 701
INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
v.
PAIUTE-SHOSHONE INDIANS OF THE BISHOP COMMUNITY OF THE BISHOP COLONY ET AL.
No. 02-281.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 31, 2003.
Decided May 19, 2003.
The Bishop Paiute Tribe in California chartered and wholly owns the Bishop Paiute Gaming Corporation, which operates and manages the Paiute Palace Casino (Casino), a tribal gaming operation. When the Inyo County District Attorney asked the Casino for the employment records of three Casino employees under investigation for welfare fraud, the Tribe responded that its privacy policy precluded…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Ginsburg; Opinion of the Court · Ginsburg; Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.