Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Magee
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 20, 1908No. 16,741PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Go-urt, Parish of Washington; Thomas. Moore Burns, Judge. Action by Samuel M. Carroll and wife-against Joe N. Magee, sheriff, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
*627Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
Plaintiffs enjoined the sale under executory process of certain property which they claim as a homestead, and they appeal from a judgment dissolving their injunction and dismissing their suit. The case was decided in the district court, and is presented here, on the following agreed statement of facts, to wit:
“That the plaintiff Samuel Carroll will testify as follows (subject to the objection by the defendants that such testimony is inadmissible, in the absence of evidence to show that the promissory note mentioned in the petition was acquired "by defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pertuit v. DamareSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- Carpenter v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1862
- State National Bank v. FlathersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- State v. TolmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrews v. McCreary Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Jefferson v. HeroldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Becker v. HamptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Reymond v. Louisiana Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Banahan v. SvarvaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.