Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Petersen

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 6, 1957No. Civ. No. 9599Published

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff insurance company filed this action under the Federal Interpleader Act, 28 U.S.C.A. 41(26),* to determine who is entitled to receive $915.44, the proceeds of two insurance policies on the *766life of Frederick W. Petersen, now deceased. In both policies the company agreed, inter alia, “to pay upon receipt of due proof of the death of the Insured and upon surrender of this Policy and evidence of premium payment hereunder, the amount stipulated in said Schedule, to the executor or administrator of the Insured, unless payment be made under the provisions of the next…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Hani v. Germania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. v. City Nat. Bank of FairmontDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1950
  4. Kenneth Houtz v. General Bonding & Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Ratsch v. RengelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API