Legal Opinion

Webster v. Lane

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 17, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff removed her fur coat in the reception room of defendant, a dentist, and left it there while she was undergoing treatment. On returning to the reception room later her coat could not be found. While the plaintiff was in the dentist’s chair her coat was not visible, and it is evident that she could not be said to have continued to keep it in her possession as in Wentworth v. Biggs (159 App. Div. 899) or in Apfel v. Whyte’s, Inc. (110 Misc. 670). In fact, the existence of the reception room and the absence of any closet or other appropriate place to deposit wraps indicated that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. . SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Wentworth v. RiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Apfel v. Whyte's, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schleisner Co. v. BirchettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. Laval v. LeopoldCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API