Legal Opinion
Malakoff v. Board Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1210 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Robert I. Malakoff and Carole E. Malakoff (Appellants) bring this appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which affirmed the decision of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh (Board) to grant certain special exceptions and variances to 568 South Aiken Avenue Corporation and J. D. J. Associates, (Intervenors, hereinafter Applicant).
*111Applicant is the owner of the subject property, 568 South Aiken Avenue, which is located in an R-2, two-family residential district in the seventh ward of the City of Pittsburgh. The property is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Filanowski v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Philadelphia v. AngeloneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Marlowe v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Schaefer v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cromwell v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Hill District Project Area Committee, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Appeal of GregorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Spring Garden Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Municipality of Monroeville v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.