Legal Opinion
People v. Wendelken
New York City Magistrates' Court
Decided February 25, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid L. Malbin, J.
On June 28, 1956, at or about 8:45 p.m., the defendant was served with a summons charging him with violation of sections 121 and 124 of article 9 of the Traffic Regulations of the City of New York. Section 121 forbids obstructing traffic, and section 124 is concerned with “Advertising Vehicles.”
The circumstances which led to the issuance of the summons are clear and without dispute. The defendant was operating a *443truck on the body of which was mounted an aerial searchlight five feet in diameter. The details of the manner and the position in which the truck was parked need not be discussed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fifth Avenue Coach Co. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.New York Court of Special Session · 1947
- People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- People v. KearnsNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morris v. International Yogurt Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- People v. StockNassau County District Court · 1976
- Morris v. International Yogurt Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985