Legal Opinion

T. Harry Humphreys v. Amerada Hess Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1973No. 73-1305PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for damages arising from the refusal of defendant, Amerada Hess Corporation, to deliver stock under a stock option granted in 1968 to plaintiff, T. Harry Humphreys, who is now no longer employed by the corporation. From a jury verdict and judgment in favor of the corporation, Mr. Humphreys appeals.

Appellant Humphreys, an attorney, was a longtime employee of the former Amerada Petroleum Corporation. His tenure began in 1948 and prior to his termination he held the executive position of Manager of the Land Department. In 1968, pursuant to a plan adopted by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  2. Langer v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Hilgenberg v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Lindhorst v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. C. F. Braun & Co., a Corporation v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. Northern Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Klein v. TabatchnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API