Hamilton v. Landrieu
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on a Rule to Show Cause Why The Special Master’s Report Should Not Be Adopted, and a hearing therein was held on November 8, 1972.' After hearing, neither plaintiffs nor defendants having introduced any evidence to controvert the Special Master’s Report, it is hereby ordered that the Report and Recommendations filed with this court by the Special Master are hereby approved and adopted.
It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that defendants without delay shall immediately implement the following:
1. Defendants shall…
2Cited by41 opinions
- Johnny L. Spain v. Raymond K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Jerald Kendrick, Cross-Appellants v. David Bland, Cross-Appellees, United States of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Laaman v. HelgemoeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1977
- Ruiz v. EstelleDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.