Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Kearns v. Ohio Power Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1955No. 34193Published

1DissentTaft, J.

As I view this case, it involves a relatively simple problem of statutory construction. In order to prevail, relator must obviously rely upon that portion of Section 713.25, Revised Code, which provides that, after the Board of County Commissioners has adopted a plan, then in nonmunicipal territory “no public building, roadway, bridge, viaduct, or other public improvement or utility, publicly or privately owned, whose construction or location would constitute a departure from the plan, shall be constructed or authorized by the board except by unanimous vote.”

It is equally obvious that, by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ice & Fuel Co. v. KreuzweiserOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Ellis v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API