Legal Opinion

Pope v. Powers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 1936No. 3336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.'

In a suit pending in the district court of Nueces county, No. 1270SB, W. E. Pope et al. v. Theodore T. Priour et ux.; a judgment was rendered. In that suit W. E. Pope, individually and as trustee, sued Priour and wife. The litigation involved an oil and gas lease. The defendants im-pleaded J. D. Powers and Joseph Mireur. Powers employed Hon. John S. McCamp- ' bell to answer for him. The attorney so employed did answer for Powers, but immediately thereafter withdrew at the request of Powers, who then authorized the plaintiff W. E. Pope, a lawyer, to represent him. Thereafter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Dunman v. HartwellTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Holloway v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Laird v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Lessing v. Cunningham & HardeeTexas Supreme Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. E. Pope v. J. D. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Alicia Gonzalez, Ernesto Gonzalez and/or All Other Occupants 641 Milton Henry Avenue, El Paso, TX, 79932 v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API