Legal Opinion
State ex rel. D.M.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 2018No. 51,920–JACPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GASKINS (Pro Tempore), J.
Before the court is the appeal of D.M., a juvenile adjudicated delinquent for the armed robbery of James Peaden ("Mr. Peaden"). D.M. specifies three errors: (1) there was insufficient evidence for his conviction; (2) the lower court erred in refusing to grant his motion to suppress the photographic lineup identification; and (3) the trial court erred in refusing to suppress the in-court identification. For the reasons stated hereinafter, we affirm and remand with instructions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 2, 2017, Mr. Peaden ate lunch at Som-T-Eat, a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- State v. EasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- State v. TonubbeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of L.C., DOB: 12/12/2008Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025