Legal Opinion

Russell v. Houston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM COCKE. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Cocke County.— Hal. H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

This was an action of ejectment brought in the chancery court of Cocke county to recover a tract of land described in the pleadings. The right to recover was based upon two grounds, but we need consider only one of them here, viz.; that, when the present suit was brought, the controversy had already been, concluded by a decree in a prior litigation between the same parties, or their privies, in the case of Peck et al. v. Elza Houston et al., in the same court.

The chancellor decreed in favor of the complainants, and on appeal this decree was affirmed by the court of chancery appeals. Prom the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Coit v. HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  3. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Tallman v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Crocker v. BalchTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grier v. CanadaTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. King v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API