Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1994No. 2-93-054-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

The Cadle Company appeals from a take-nothing judgment in its suit against Bank-ston & Lobingier, a partnership, et al., (B & L), to recover on a promissory note and a judgment for David B. Lobingier on his eoun- terclaim for breach of contract. On appeal, Cadle complains the trial court erred in directing the verdict against it and in admitting exhibits concerning Lobingier’s inability to obtain credit, and the evidence does not support the findings of fact. Cadle further contends deemed admissions do not support the judgment because contradictory evidence was admitted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mead v. Johnson Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Hallmark v. Hand, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  3. Kyle v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Schleuter v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Luis Salazar v. William Sanders and Patricia Sanders, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API