Legal Opinion

Merritt v. WAYNE GARGUS PONTIAC-GMC TRUCK

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 6, 1996No. 2950465PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Wayne Gargus Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. ("Gargus").

Initially, we note that to enter a summary judgment, the trial court must determine that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c), Ala. R. Civ. P.;Silk v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, 437 So.2d 112 (Ala. 1983). For cases filed after June 11, 1987, Rule 56 is read in conjunction with the "substantial evidence rule," §12-21-12, Ala. Code 1975. See Bass v. SouthTrust Bank…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ott v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. City of Bessemer v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Silk v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cauthen v. YatesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Old Republic Sur. Co. v. Auction Way Sales, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Cauthen v. YatesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Faulk v. Motors Insurance Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API