Johnson v. Donham
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
On the first Monday in January, 1935, the quorum court of Pulaski County made the following' appropriations for the office of prosecuting attorney:
‘ ‘ Salaries ..........................................$17,'500.00
“Contingent expenses............... 2,500.00
“Library .........!......................!............... 2,500.00.”
The prosecuting attorney’s office is situated in the Pulaski County courthouse. The purpose of the appropriation for the library of $2,500 was to enable the purchase of a law library to be located in the office of the prosecuting attorney, and this suit is to enjoin its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Prairie County v. Leathem & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Craig v. GradySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ark. Association of County Judges v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Needham v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Gordon v. Woodruff CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Pressley v. Deal, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Martin v. BrattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.