Legal Opinion

Wright v. Tschirn

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 2004No. 03-1676PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I,SULLIVAN, Judge.

This is a concursus proceeding for the disbursement of attorney fees and expenses among three attorneys who represented Joseph Benoit in a federal multi-district products liability litigation against Acromed Corporation, the manufacturer of an orthopedic bone screw. One of the attorneys appeals the judgment of the trial court. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, amend, and affirm as amended the judgment of the trial court.

Facts

A number of attorneys represented Mr. Benoit prior to and during the course of the multi-district litigation which ended in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John Bonura & Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Trinity Universal Insurance Company v. NormandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Hollywood Casino Shreveport v. Shreveport Paddlewheels, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Syrie v. SchilabLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Verges v. DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. In Re: Mma Law Firm, PllcSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2026
  3. Verges v. DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API