Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Young

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Wayne District Qourt. — ITon. W. DO. Tedford, Judge. Action in partition. Defendant W. W. Young claimed sole title to a part of the real estate involved. Prom a decree in his favor, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

The parties plaintiffs and defendants are children and beirs at law of one Jonathan: Young, who died seized of the real estate involved, being nearly four hundred acres. Jonathan Young left a widow surviving him. She has since died, and the controversy here is over the question whether she took a homestead interest in the real estate of her deceased husband, or, at her death, was entitled to her distributive share. Before stating the facts, it will be well to dispose of some objections to evidence. Several questions 1 asked of W. W. Young were objected to as being incompetent, immaterial, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Egbert v. EgbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. Zwick v. JohnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Burdick v. RaymondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Wold v. BerkholtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Wilcox v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GunkelWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Van Veen v. Van VeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Feltes v. TobinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Bosworth v. BlaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API