Legal Opinion

Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Forest Service

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 1, 2014No. 2:12-cv-1676-TLN-CMKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

The matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment by Plaintiffs Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center and Klamath Forest Alliance (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants United States Forest Service, District Ranger David Hays, and Forest Service Chief Tom Sidwell (“Defendants”). At issue is Defendants’ review and approval of the High Bar Mining Project (the “Project”), a gold mining operation located in the Salmon River watershed in northern California. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ review and approval violated the National…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ForestKeeper v. La PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API