Brown v. Thomas

The defendant has appealed from a judgment confirming a default, rendered against him as maker of a note to the order of Hyde & Oglesby, protested at maturity for non-payment. The plaintiff sues as endorsee. The appellant assigns for errors in the judgment:

1st. That the supplemental petition was not legally served.

2d. That no proof was offered of the endorsement of the payees.

The first of these points is not tenable. The supplemental petition was served in the mode directed by Art. 199 of the Code of Practice.

Upon the second point the record contains no statement of facts, nor any evidence of…