Legal Opinion

Bonslett v. Butte County Canal Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1912No. Civ. No. 908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order denying a new trial. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Mandamus. Plaintiff brings the action to compel defendant to deliver water to plaintiff’s land in accordance with the agreement set forth in his amended complaint. It is alleged that defendant is a corporation formed “for the purpose of appropriating and selling water for irrigation and domestic purposes in the county of Butte, . . .’ and of constructing and maintaining a system of canals, main branch and lateral ditches for the distribution and sale of said water so appropriated by it”; that “defendant has heretofore constructed and is now the owner of a certain system of canals, main branch…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giraud v. MilovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Starr Piano Co. v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Farren v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API