Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Reading Blue Mountain & Northern Railroad
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MUNLEY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court for disposition is Defendant Reading Blue Mountain & Northern Railroad Company’s motion to disqualify Janssen & Keenan, P.C. as counsel for Plaintiff Norfolk Southern Railway Company in the present case. This matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, we will grant the motion and disqualify Janssen & Keenan.
I. Background
On May 1, 2003, Janssen & Keenan filed the Complaint on behalf of Norfolk against Reading in the instant action. On June 3, 2003, Charles Howard Esq. of Gollatz, Griffen, &…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Dworkin v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fetterman, S. v. Cochran, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022