Legal Opinion

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Reading Blue Mountain & Northern Railroad

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 2005No. 3:03cv736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MUNLEY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court for disposition is Defendant Reading Blue Mountain & Northern Railroad Company’s motion to disqualify Janssen & Keenan, P.C. as counsel for Plaintiff Norfolk Southern Railway Company in the present case. This matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, we will grant the motion and disqualify Janssen & Keenan.

I. Background

On May 1, 2003, Janssen & Keenan filed the Complaint on behalf of Norfolk against Reading in the instant action. On June 3, 2003, Charles Howard Esq. of Gollatz, Griffen, &…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Dworkin v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fetterman, S. v. Cochran, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API