Legal Opinion

Lemings v. Taylor

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided June 23, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00768Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MATTHEW LEMINGS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS CHARLES TAYLOR, ET AL. NO. 18-00768-BAJ-SDJ RULING AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 94), seeking dismissal of Plaintiff Matthew Lemings’ claims of future lost wages and lost earning capacity. Plaintiffs oppose Defendants’ Motion. (Doc. 101). For reasons to follow, Defendants’ Motion will be granted, and Plaintiffs’ claims of future lost wages and lost earning capacity will be dismissed with prejudice. L BACKGROUND A. Undisputed Facts The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Aisole v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. Pontiff v. Pecot & Associates Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Branan v. Allstate Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API