Legal Opinion

People v. Montgomery

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 13, 2007No. 5-06-0344PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wexstten

The State appeals from the circuit court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress statements. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

In 2003, the defendant, an 18-year-old resident of Arnold, Missouri, was charged with burglarizing a locksmith business located in Cahokia, Illinois. The defendant later moved to suppress inculpatory statements that he had made to officers from the Arnold police department and the Cahokia police department. In 2005, at a hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress, the following evidence was adduced.

In January 2003, the defendant lived…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. LopezIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pueblo v. Millán PachecoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
  3. People v. BeltranAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. People v. SotoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. People v. BeltranAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API