Legal Opinion

Benford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1928No. 19143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeti-i, J.

1. “There being no proof of a plenary confession by the accused, but, at most, evidence only of incriminatory admissions, it was such an error to charge the law relating to confessions as to require the grant of a new trial. These incriminatory admissions are not conclusive; and proof of inculpatory admissions will not authorize a charge upon the subject of confession. Owens v. State, 120 Ga. 296 (48 S. E. 21; Riley v. State, 1 Ga. App. 651 (57 S. E. 1031), and decisions cited.” Porter v. State, 11 Ga. App. 246 (74 S. E. 1099). Under the foregoing ruling the judge erred in charging the law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Beasley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Chislon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meriwether v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Theis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Oliphant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API