Legal Opinion

Clarence E. Bott v. Beryl A. Anding, and the Kroger Co., and Third-Party and A. E. Anding, Third-Party And

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 29, 1961No. 13373PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOCH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Clarence E. Bott, brought this action' to recover damages under the Illinois Structural Work Act, more commonly known as the “Scaffold Act,” Chap. 48, §§60 and 69, Illinois Revised Stat. 1957. Defendant Beryl A. Anding was the joint owner, with her husband, A. E. Anding, of the real estate on which the alleged violation of the Act occurred. Defendant, The Kroger Co. (hereinafter called “Kroger”), lessee of the real estate involved and the building to be constructed thereon, filed a third party complaint against A. E. Anding. Beryl A. Anding was dismissed on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Charles A. Miller v. B. F. Goodrich Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krause v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  2. Valley v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API