Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Best

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 3, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

Four distributees of this estate, nationals of the Soviet Union, have petitioned the court for payment of their shares through a duly appointed attorney in fact. Whether payment is to be made directly to the distributees or to the city treasury, pursuant to section 269 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, depends upon the capacity of the petitioners to receive and use the funds transmitted (Matter of Yee Yoke Ban, 200 Misc. -). While it had previously been held that Bussian nationals were in a position to enjoy the benefit of their distributive shares (e.g., Matter of Alexandroff,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of GeffenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of ThomaeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. In re the Accounting of TerryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  3. In re the Accounting of AronsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  4. In re the Accounting of DoboNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  5. In re the Estate of KleinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API