Legal Opinion

Bonschur v. John Scheidig & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 11, 1912No. 82PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York; Dearned Hand, Judge. Suit by Herman E. Bonschur against John Scheidig & Co. for infringement of letters patent No. 737,327, for eyeglasses, granted to complainant August 25, 1903. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York; Dearned Hand, Judge. Suit by Herman E. Bonschur against John Scheidig & Co. for infringement of letters patent No. 737,327, for eyeglasses, granted to complainant August 25, 1903. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals. Following is the opinion of the District Court by Hand, District Judge: Tliis invention is of an improvement in eyeglass clips, which enables the clip to be bent in substantially its own plane so that the glass may be brought from or towards the eyes, or tlie angle of the glass’…

1Per curiam

We agree with Judge Hand in the conclusions reached by him, and, as he has fully discussed the questions involved, we affirm the decree upon his opinion.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. McElligott v. KissamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API