Legal Opinion

Martin v. Gotham National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtFaber, J.

The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants O’Shea and Montville Construction Company were engaged in a contracting business, O’Shea owning practically all of the stock of the company and controlling it; that the defendants Banning and Lockwood were agents and employees of the defendant Gotham National Bank of New York, Banning being one of the assistant vice-presidents; that, prior to the month of April, 1923, the bank had loaned O’Shea or the Montville Construction Company about $2,400, which loan was evidenced by a promissory note of the construction company and O’Shea,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Bloomquist v. . FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Benedict v. . ArnouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API