Legal Opinion · Dissent

Investors Premium Corp. v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 3, 1973No. 19543Published

1DissentBussey, Justice

(dissenting) :

Pertinent to the proper disposition of this appeal is the following language from Fuller v. Tax Commission, 128 S. C. 14, 121 S. E. 478:

“(W)here the language relied upon to bring the particular person or subject within the law is ambiguous or is reasonably susceptible of an interpretation that would exclude the person or subject sought to be taxed, the well-established general rule requires that any substantial doubt should be resolved against the government and in favor of the taxpayer (United States v. Merriam [263 U. S. 179], 44 S. Ct. 69, 68 L. Ed. 240). In the application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Wingfield v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Fuller v. S. C. Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Personal Finance Co. of New York v. LyonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API