Ernest Smith v. United States of America, Beatrice K. Brown v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellants were convicted in separate jury trials of forging and uttering government checks. The District Court denied a motion to appeal in forma pau-peris, but leave was given by this Court to proceed in forma pauperis and the cases were heard here on their merits. Because a single issue is involved in each case, they were heard together.
The appellants are each Negroes. At their respective trials in June, 1958, at Norfolk, Virginia, counsel for Appellant Brown asked prospective jurors on the voir dire examination the following question: “Are there any members of the jury panel who are a…
2Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Walter Augustus Bowe, Robert Steele Collier, and Khaleel Sultarn SayyedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- State v. HillsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- United States v. Roscoe Thomas BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Alec Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- People v. PresleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.