Shupp v. Farrar
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a will. At the conclusion of testimony on behalf of the contestants, the trial court on motion of contestees directed the jury to return a verdict sustaining the will.
The first assignment of error is that the judgment is contrary to law because the will was not attested and subscribed by two or more competent witnesses as required by Section 10504-3, General Code. The second assignment of error is that the court erred in directing the verdict where there was evidence of fraud, undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity. As to the second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. WildmanOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Lee v. StephensOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
- Fox v. LynchOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- Loss v. Winters National Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MoorisonWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Schuler v. SchulerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Johnson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020