Legal Opinion

In re Kirwan

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 7, 1948No. 5507PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 9,10,11,12,13, and 14 in appellant’s application for a patent for “certain new and useful improvements in Braising Of Fish Meat In The Process Of Canning Or Dehydrating.” No claims were allowed.

Claims 9, 11, and 12 are drawn to the process of braising the fish, and claim 14 to the product resulting from the process. Claims 9 and 14 are sufficiently illustrative. They read:

9. Process for preparing a braised fish meat product for canning…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of SuttonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  2. Application of CraigeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. Application of Swentzel (Carborundum Co., Assignee)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API