Legal Opinion

Woodhouse v. McCarthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff may seek recoupment of payments for medical assistance by using remedies provided in article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Crabb v Estate of Mager, 66 AD2d 20; Matter of Rhodes, 148 Misc 2d 744; Bandas v Emperor, 121 Misc 2d 192). Dismissal of the action was not required because of plaintiff’s failure to name the estate of Edna McCarthy as a defendant. The proper remedy for nonjoinder, as Supreme Court determined, was to direct plaintiff to petition Surrogate’s Court for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crabb v. Estate of MagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. In re the Estate of RhodesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1990
  3. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Bandas v. EmperorNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API