Catholic Charities of Diocese v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner applied to respondent Zoning Board of Appeals (Board) for a use variance that would eliminate from the zoning ordinance the "owner-occupied” status as it applied to the subject property. Petitioner was entitled to a use variance because it had demonstrated unnecessary hardship in that the property would not yield a reasonable rate of return unless the restriction were eliminated, the restriction had placed the owner in a unique plight, and elimination of the restriction would not alter the essential character of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Commco, Inc. v. AmelkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.