Tookak v. State

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

This is a sentence appeal after a remand. See Tookak v. State, 648 P.2d 1018 (Alaska App.1982). Tookak raises three issues. First, he contends that the trial court failed to comply with the mandate issued by this court vacating his original sentence. Second, he contends that the trial court violated his constitutional right to be present during his resentencing. Finally, he contends the sentence imposed was excessive. We affirm.

On January 6, 1979, Charles Tookak was convicted of kidnapping, rape, assault with intent to commit rape and joyriding. These convictions were…