Maytag v. Vaughn & Sons
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. Action to recover specific personal property. Trial by the court. Judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtServers, J.
— The property in controversy consists of certain corn planters. Several errors are assigned, but they simply amount to this, that the court erred in finding for the defendants. •
The defendants claim the goods were furnished to them by the manufacturers, under a contract that if not sold in 1882 they were, to be carried over until 1883, and then sold and accounted for. The evidence is largely in writing. We have each separately examined the evidence, and separately reached the conclusion that the circuit court correctly determined the facts, and therefore the judgment is correct. No possible…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Allison v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Schnathorst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Fusario v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.