Vasquez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s “Motion for Sentencing Relief Convert to Term Probation.” The motion does not establish an “illegal” sentence that can be corrected at any time. See Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173, 1178 (Fla.2001). Instead, as the trial court recognized, the motion presented untimely and meritless claims directed toward trial counsel and the conviction in general. The trial court properly denied the motion and cautioned Appellant that subsequent mer-itless claims could result in sanctions.
We warn Appellant as well. Appellant has previously filed at least five…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.