Legal Opinion

Rose v. Saunders

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1934No. Nos. 7206, 7207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

These two actions are identical, except that in ease No. 7207 the Calaveras Water Users’ Association is the sole defendant, and in ease No. 7206 there are 105 defendants. In view of the fact that there is no distinction between the two cases, we will refer to them as one, and to the parties as appellant and appellees, without attempting to distinguish between the two actions.

The suit is in the nature of an action to quiet title by the plaintiff, who claims to be the tenant in common, owning an undivided one-half interest in all the properties described in the complaint.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Devine v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. WickhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
  3. Edenborn v. WigtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. Federal Home Loan Bank v. Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  5. Norton v. United Gas Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API