M. T. Stevens & Sons Co. v. Daigneault

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The plaintiff (defendant in error) seeks to recover damages for personal injuries which he claims arose from his occupation while employed by the defendant (plaintiff in error) in its woolen mill. The gist of the plaintiff’s claim is that the defendant failed to warn of the dangers of his employment. The trial was by jury, and upon the evidence the following facts would 'seem to have been established beyond controversy:

The plaintiff entered the employ of the defendant on March 29, 1920, and was put to work in the “picker room,” so -called. In , the performance of his…