Legal Opinion

Charlene Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1992No. 91-1215PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

After police shot and killed their two dogs during the execution of a search warrant, plaintiffs brought this section 1983 action against the municipal defendants employing the police officers involved. They alleged that the municipalities had failed to adequately train their officers, and that such failure amounted to a municipal policy. The district court, 755 F.Supp. 726 (N.D.Tex.1991), dismissed the complaint because it did not satisfy this circuit’s “heightened pleading requirement.” Under the heightened pleading standard, a complaint must allege with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kohl v. CassonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Ken Mouille, Leroy Liberda v. The City of Live Oak, Texas, Mark E. Jackley, Douglas Faesler, and Timothy BrittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Jordan v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API