Legal Opinion

Appeal of Barry

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1998No. 97-165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The petitioners, Kevin G. Barry and Marcel J. Gagnon, appeal an order of the Board of Trustees of the City of Manchester Employees’ Contributory Retirement System (retirement board) offsetting their workers’ compensation lump sum settlements against their retirement disability pensions. We reverse and remand.

This is the second time this case has come before us. See Appeal of Barry, 141 N.H. 170, 681 A.2d 75 (1996). In the first appeal, the petitioners argued that the City of Manchester (city) was not authorized to modify the retirement system by amending the city charter. Id. at 173, 681 A.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TseliosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Girard v. Town of AllenstownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Appeal of AFSCME Local 3657, Londonderry Police EmployeesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Appeal of BarrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berent v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. Appeal of StantonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. City of Manchester School District v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Michael Joseph Berent, Michael Steven Romp, Jeff Wayne Thorne, Paul Bryson Ingram, Nichelle Aline Thompson, Rodney Edward Sullivan, Sara Lillis Epstein, Sara Crane Swisher, Bette Jayne Mayes, Caroline M. Dieterle, Matt Blizek, Mori Constantino, Amanda Coyne, Lolly Eggers, Ellen Haywood, Jon Klinkowitz, Karen Kubby, Bob Thompson, James Walters, Roberta Till Retz And Jennie Louise EmbreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API