State, Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support ex rel. T.M.A. v. Pickins
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGaskins, J.
hThe Louisiana Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a rule to show cause why the defendant, Roger Pickins, should not be held in contempt for failure to pay child support for his minor child, Q.Q.A. The trial court held that the default judgment finding the defendant to be the father of Q.Q.A. and ordering him to pay child support, was null. Accordingly, the trial court denied the motion by the DSS to hold the defendant in contempt for failure to pay child support. The DSS appealed. For .the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meshell v. RussellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mitchell v. BassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Summit Construction, Inc. v. Robinson Contracting & Equipment Rental, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pollock v. TALCO MIDSTREAM ASSETS, LTD.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- NorthShore Regional Medical Center, LLC v. DillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Folse v. St. Rose Farms, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014