Legal Opinion
Moody v. James Irr. Dist.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 1940No. 9353PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory ■decree confirming a plan of the James Irrigation District [hereinafter referred to as the District] for a composition of its indebtedness under Chapter IX of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 as amended, 11 U.S.C. A. §§ 401-404.
The District consists of a gross area of about 24,390 acres in Fresno County, California, and was organized as of February 6, 1920 pursuant to the California Irrigation District Act, Cal.Stats.1897, p. 254 as amended, Deering’s Gen.Laws, Act 3854.
On May 16, 1920, the District issued its 6% bonds aggregating in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- West Coast Life Ins. Co. v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lorber v. Vista Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- In re Imperial Irr. DistDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
- Taylor v. Provident Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Thomas v. El Dorado Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.