Legal Opinion

Fort v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor. -Before Judge Westmoreland. Criminal court- of Atlanta. May term, 1893. The facts were agreed on and submitted to the judge. He held the defendant guilty, and exception was taken to the refusal of a new trial.

Read the full summary

Accusation of misdemeanor. -Before Judge Westmoreland. Criminal court- of Atlanta. May term, 1893. The facts were agreed on and submitted to the judge. He held the defendant guilty, and exception was taken to the refusal of a new trial. On April 13, 1893, as agent for the Guarantee and Accident Lloyds, in Fulton county, defendant issued a policy of accident insurance, without the Guarantee and Accident Lloyds having received from the insurance commissioner of this State a certificate of authority or license for itself or its agents to transact business in Georgia. The business of accident…

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

A careful reading of the act of October 24th, 1887, “to regulate the business of insurance in this State, and for other purposes” (Acts of 1886-7, p. 113), will satisfy the reader that the General Assembly intended therein to deal only with insurance companies chartered by this State, or other States, or by a foreign government. The second section of the act requires incorporated insurance companies to procure licenses from the insurance commissioner as a necessary prerequisite to the transaction of the business of insurance in this State; *10but neither in this section, nor in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McPherson v. City of DawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Jalonick v. Greene County Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. State v. AlleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API