Legal Opinion

Safic Alcan & Cie v. M/T KASCO

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 16, 2008No. 07 CIV. 3977(JSR)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Safic Alcan & Cie (“Safic”) and PT Agro Jaya Perdana brought this action against defendant Starfish Enterprises, Inc. (“Starfish”) to recover $400,000 in damages to plaintiffs’ palm oil while aboard Starfish’s vessel, the M/T Kasco. The parties agree that the charter party governing their transaction provides that this claim should be arbitrated, but dispute whether the arbitration should go forward in New York or in London. By letter-briefs dated April 30, 2008, the parties applied to the Court to interpret the charter party in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Topps Co., Inc. v. Cadbury Stani SAICCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Seabury Construction Corporation v. Jeffrey Chain CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Great Circle Lines, Ltd. v. Matheson & Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Andolina Shipping Ltd. v. TBS Eurolines Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API