Legal Opinion

Van Wert v. Chidester

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Kalamazoo Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The bill in this case was filed for the purpose of establishing an equitable title of the complainant in certain lands in the county of Kalamazoo, the legal title to which was in his father, Adrian Van Wert, at the time of his decease. The defendants constitute, with complainant, all the persons interested in the estate of Adrian Van Wert, being his widow, heirs at law and administrators.

The land in question was purchased from the state, and the original certificate was taken in the name of complainant, hut was assigned to the father, as complainant avers, for the purpose of giving to his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Emerson v. AtwaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Downey v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. More v. LutherMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API